Over on /r/emacs, one of the community members asked the about Integrated Development Environments (IDEs 🔍) with the following post:
I have been using emacs for an year now mostly for Clojure development with little bit of golang and python here and there. When i started using emacs here i convinced myself that
- it makes me more productive by allowing me to do everything from keyboard
- multi language support with packages
- highly customisable with thousands of packages and config.
- suited for clojure development.
- org mode
But lately i have been thinking if i was wrong or if my assumptions still holds true, today ides like vs code provide all the above features in a fast modern looking ide.
So does the question of Emacs vs Modern IDEs boils down to asthetic choice between modern vs classic/vintage or is there any real advantage in using Emacs today.
I posted my response regarding Emacs 🔍 but figured I’d share that observation here as well:
I use Emacs for 3 reasons:
- Note Taking
Is it best for coding? Maybe not. Corporate sponsored IDEs sure seem to provide lots of tooling. (Those same companies deploy a “Embrace, Extend, and Extinguish” strategy regarding FOSS. They’re trying to enclose the commons) .
But, coding is only one concern. I write a lot. For both personal and professional reasons. And in this case Emacs shines like none other; I’ve used Textmate 🔍, Sublime Text 🔍, Atom text editor 🔍, and Visual Studio Code 🔍 for those purposes.
But, what I’ve found: using the same tool for all three results in expanding my thinking and ability regarding those three primary topics. When I make one conceptual gain (e.g., think about a function that helps me in my note taking) my other two primary contexts benefit.
And after posting, I continued to think about this.
In the years before adopting Emacs, I would write all kinds of functions for gaming and note taking. I think to my GM::Notepad. After I released that tool, a fellow gamer and tinkerer on the computer gently quipped: “Interesting, were I to have done this I would’ve written that in Emacs.”
I like the concepts of GM::Notepad, but it failed because to use it, I had to run outside of one of my normal contexts. Yes, I often have a terminal window open. However, that context primes me for one off considerations; which is antithetical to the mindset I’m taking while running an Role Playing Game (RPG 🔍).
That comment sat with me, not as anything damning, but as a reminder that we each approach problems with different tools.
Where as I’m quite good at Ruby 🔍, I’m asking myself, “Why not encode this in Emacs? After all this is where I spend more and more of my digital day.”
From another vantage, by continuing to leverage Emacs, I’m reducing the context switching. And in reducing context switching, I’m creating more space to connect pieces of information to build my personal knowledge.
At this stage, I can’t imagine switching from Emacs to any other software; I’m finding the lessons I’ve learned compound, further expanding my understanding of how I can use Emacs to further my understanding of the games I play, the articles I read, the code I write, and all of the interconnections that emerge.
Emacs helps me get better at doing better with digital information.